Some Questions I'm Asking Scientists And A Few Thoughts

-

Just thought I’d share some questions I’m asking scientists:
Is consciousness made out of particles and waves?
Or is the brain made out of particles and waves and consciousness is a property/emergent phenomenon/epiphenomenon/byproduct/illusion of particles and waves?
If consciousness isn’t made of particles and waves then wouldn’t it be nonphysical.
If consciousness is made out of particles/waves/fields then consciousness is one with the quantum level and all quantum characteristics apply to consciousness.
Such as quantum entanglement, retrocausality, etc.
—
If the mind is identical with the brain, then that means the mind is made of atoms, elementary particles, waves, fields, etc. All the way down to the quantum level the mind is present since, after all, neuroscientists proclaim the mind IS the brain.
This opens the doorway I think, to everything being one to the ultimate degree. Since consciousness displays the properties of quantum physics, namely, non-locality. And most importantly, there won’t just be eternal oblivion as a reality for you at/after you die. Because you’re everywhere at once, therefore, you can never not exist. You didn’t come into existence and you’ll never go out of existence.
Nothing itself is nothing. The unconscious probably doesn’t exist. It self-nullifies itself. Nothing most likely doesn’t have any reality. There’s no unconsciousness in coma/syncope/slow-wave sleep/etc and no nothing “out there.” You’re the sole observer, called reality, that is/as in, everything ever, observing your infinite self and there’s nothing other than you. Every “part” of reality is entangled and in an unbreakable relationship.
A lot of my point, regards why it’s silly that quantum effects only apply at the quantum scale and not at the level of our brains.

I should add:
We’ve already seen quantum effects percolating up to the biological scale. The field of science called quantum biology that’s actually taken serious by some shows this. So, that seems to be evidence to me that the quantum realm is one with the mental/neural level.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some Thoughts On Existence And Nonexistence

-
Image
  Hopefully, with existence, we’ll only be dying in a dream. Which is fine because it’s just an illusory end. An illusion of being the permanent end of existence. So the fear is for nothing. It’s either a temporary end or there’s not even a gap of temporal nonexistence that you somehow undergo. You just remain conscious at the instant of death. And onwards. In that even temporal unconsciousness for you is not an option, because you can never not exist in some way, some form or state. The appearance of going unconscious ever during life is an assumption, since just because you don’t remember what was going on in your mind and reality. It doesn’t mean you weren’t there in any way. It only means you don’t recall what was going on for you, perhaps. It doesn’t mean you were nonexistent in those times you don’t remember anything, per say. No memory doesn’t imply no experience. For instance, when you’re blacked out drunk you’re clearly having experience, it’s just not reco...
Read more

Fixation To One Organism/Experience

-
Image
What level of brain damage would cause you to detach to your cosmic self or into another organism, how close to death before that happens? What if you are revived from death, i.e. cryonics, provided cryogenic preservation/revival works, do you come back from your cosmic self/the other organism to once again exist as the one who was revived? And then if duplicates of your organism nature creates exist of you in the future, would they be you? As in, quantum fluctuations out of the vacuum pop duplicates of your connectome into existence in uncountable lengths of time. Why do we always seem to be fixed in this particular organism we’re experiencing?
Read more

Permutations Of Personal Identity

-
Image
Possibility 1: Solipsism – you’re only as yourself, in this one form (and you’re eternal). Possibility 2: Open individualism – You’re one self throughout infinite forms (you = eternal). Possibility 3: Science/eternal oblivion – each self is finite, and there’s probably an infinity of them. Possibility 4: Each being is eternal but doesn’t experience each other as themself – there’s an infinity of different selves. So which is it? And how can we truly know? ...The most fundamental mysteries. I think we’re really onto something. All of us, which reject the certitude scientists hold in an external objective physical reality independent and outside of consciousness. I think we’re turning the tide. And a new non-nihilistic science including the observer is emerging. It’s wonderful.
Read more